BTC live calls

Model predictions for the next BTC candle, logged before the candle opens · BTC 81,572 · updated 2026-10-17 01:00 UTC · refreshes every minute
Next 15-minute candle · 01:00 UTC
▲ UP 53.8%
more confident than 65% of the last 30 days' calls
1h call for this hour: green → agrees
Next 1-hour candle · 01:00 UTC
▲ UP 51.8%
building history

Live track record

CandleResolved callsRightMost confident 10%Last 24hLast 7 days
15m2548.0%0.0% (3)48.0% (25)48.0% (25)
1h650.0%–50.0% (6)50.0% (6)

15m calls that agree with the 1h call: 50.0% (16) · disagree: 37.5% (8)

Analyst view · from closed candles at 2026-10-17 01:00 UTC

Bottom line
Neutral for the next 24h: nothing reliable on the chart points clearly one way.
Model's next-candle calls: 15m up 54%, 1h up 52%.

No setup on the chart right now is reliable (held in both periods with z ≥ 3) or a reliable failure.

Key areas (ranked)
ZoneDistanceReacted ≥1 ATR (vs random line)Typical moveScore
Above price (resistance)
no zone within 10% that strictly beats random
Below price (support)
no zone within 10% that strictly beats random
Score = points above random of the parts that beat random in both 2017-21 and 2022+ (BTC 1h): 2+ / 3+ levels merged, an unfilled 1h / 4h FVG in the zone, high-volume zone, day / week level (or none), retested within 48h. Only zones whose own mix of these beat random lines in both 2017-21 and 2022+ with z ≥ 3 are shown. Reaction rate = past touches of the same kind of zone that bounced at least 1 ATR before going 1 ATR through it within 24h; typical move = median bounce when it reacted.
More: 5 other setup(s), trend, FVGs and all key levels
Also on the chart (no reliable edge)
  • ▲ 1h · Retest of unfilled bullish FVG · gap 81,476-81,524
    no reliable edge 53% vs 52% normal after 24h · 6568 cases since 2017 · z +0.1
  • ▲ 1h · Level zone: bounce from above · 81,548 (Prev day VAL)
    no reliable edge 54% vs 52% normal after 24h · 3744 cases since 2017 · z +1.4 (based on Prev day VAL: bounce from above)
  • ▼ 1h · Level zone: rejected from below · 81,811 (Anchored VWAP (from swing low))
    no reliable edge 45% vs 48% normal after 24h · 3663 cases since 2017 · z -1.4 (based on Anchored VWAP (from swing low): rejected from below)
  • ▼ 4h · Retest of unfilled bearish FVG · gap 81,816-81,842
    no reliable edge 49% vs 48% normal after 24h · 1475 cases since 2017 · z +1.3
  • ▲ 4h · Level zone: bounce from above · 81,000-81,214 (Round $1,000 + Prev day VAL + Prev day POC)
    no reliable edge 50% vs 52% normal after 24h · 2967 cases since 2017 · z -0.4 (based on Round $1,000: bounce from above)

1h (last closed candle 10-17 00:00 UTC): trend range / mixed; last structure break: BOS down at swing low 81,688, 9 candle(s) ago; unfilled FVGs within 3%: bullish 81,476-81,524; bearish 81,678-81,684; bearish 81,662-81,868; bullish 80,773-81,755.

4h (last closed candle 10-16 20:00 UTC): trend range / mixed; last structure break: CHoCH up at swing high 82,634, 3 candle(s) ago; unfilled FVGs within 3%: bearish 81,816-81,842; bearish 82,083-83,029; bullish 78,491-80,556.

Key level zone (levels within 0.3% merged)From price
81,548-81,714 (Prev day VAL + Anchored VWAP (from swing high))+0.07%testing now
81,805-82,000 (Anchored VWAP (from swing low) + Round $1,000)+0.41%testing now
80,809-81,000 (Prev day low + Round $1,000)-0.82%
82,241 (Prev day POC)+0.82%
82,595 (Prev day VAH)+1.25%
80,394 (Prev week low)-1.44%
82,941-83,052 (Prev day high + Prev week POC)+1.75%
77,245 (Prev month POC)-5.30%

Setups are detected with fixed rules from closed candles. Reliable = moved the expected way more often than normal in both 2017-21 and 2022+, with z ≥ 3 at 24h (each cluster of overlapping events counted once). Usually fails = less often than normal in both periods, z ≤ −3. Edges are a few points — context, not signals.

Recent calls

Candle (UTC)SizeCallP(up)Actual
10-17 01:001hup51.8%pending
10-17 01:0015mup53.8%pending
10-17 00:4515mup52.9%red✗
10-17 00:3015mdown45.5%red✓
10-17 00:1515mdown46.0%red✓
10-17 00:001hup50.3%red✗
10-17 00:0015mdown48.5%green✗
10-16 23:4515mup55.2%red✗
10-16 23:3015mup52.0%red✗
10-16 23:1515mdown45.5%red✓
10-16 23:001hdown46.2%red✓
10-16 23:0015mdown48.6%red✓
10-16 22:4515mdown48.1%green✗
10-16 22:3015mdown45.7%red✓
10-16 22:1515mdown44.2%green✗
10-16 22:001hdown45.3%green✗
10-16 22:0015mdown49.8%green✗
10-16 21:4515mdown49.8%red✓
10-16 21:3015mup51.2%red✗
10-16 21:1515mdown47.0%green✗
10-16 21:001hdown43.9%red✓
10-16 21:0015mdown48.3%red✓
10-16 20:4515mdown47.5%green✗
10-16 20:3015mdown44.8%green✗
10-16 20:1515mdown49.5%green✗
10-16 20:001hdown49.9%green✗
10-16 20:0015mdown46.6%red✓
10-16 19:4515mup51.8%green✓
10-16 19:3015mdown46.3%red✓
10-16 19:1515mdown44.8%green✗
10-16 19:001hup55.8%green✓
10-16 19:0015mup53.3%green✓
10-16 18:4515mup53.5%green✓

Backtest reference (unseen 2024-26 data): about 53-55% right on every candle, about 58-60% on the most confident 10%. A 50% coin flip is the baseline; short runs swing a lot (±7 points over 200 calls). Decision support only — no trades are placed, and in every test the edge per candle was smaller than trading costs.